<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Persistence Ignorant Objects with ActiveRecord</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaltiere.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=52" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaltiere.com/index.php/2008/07/08/persistence-ignorant-objects-with-activerecord/</link>
	<description>.NET Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerebrado</title>
		<link>http://www.jaltiere.com/index.php/2008/07/08/persistence-ignorant-objects-with-activerecord/comment-page-1/#comment-48563</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerebrado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaltiere.com/?p=52#comment-48563</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack. Nice work! I&#039;m new knowing active recod and this is what I was looking for about using it and decoupling business objects from its persistance logic. But I have 1 question:
When you make an interface for each repository and then you implement that interface in your repository objects, you are writing each method to acess your data. It&#039;s looks to me that you are finllay bulding a DAL with repository objects but instead of accessing the database you are accessing Nhibernate queries. How is it better using active records instead of writting an ordinary DAL ? (I mean, I need to write a lot of methods, for each one, but my DAL would be more performant because it wouldn&#039;t use reflexion) Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack. Nice work! I&#8217;m new knowing active recod and this is what I was looking for about using it and decoupling business objects from its persistance logic. But I have 1 question:<br />
When you make an interface for each repository and then you implement that interface in your repository objects, you are writing each method to acess your data. It&#8217;s looks to me that you are finllay bulding a DAL with repository objects but instead of accessing the database you are accessing Nhibernate queries. How is it better using active records instead of writting an ordinary DAL ? (I mean, I need to write a lot of methods, for each one, but my DAL would be more performant because it wouldn&#8217;t use reflexion) Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mathers</title>
		<link>http://www.jaltiere.com/index.php/2008/07/08/persistence-ignorant-objects-with-activerecord/comment-page-1/#comment-29692</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaltiere.com/?p=52#comment-29692</guid>
		<description>http://ejohn.org/blog/classy-query/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/classy-query/" rel="nofollow">http://ejohn.org/blog/classy-query/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
